paper journal entry from 11-3.
“i’ve been reading so much spiritual stuff, but i’ve realized i should really work more on synthesizing &* digesting it. in some ways, i’ve been just swallowing a lot of it, without really tasting it– so how could i understand it.
most recently, i read an essay about mel gibson’s passion of christ** film. the gist seemed to be that jews need to get over themselves– the anti-semitism isn’t meant, the film isn’t about them.
i feel like in a lot of ways this winds up becoming a ‘christianity is about faith’ vs. ‘christianity is about caring for others’ argument. & so… the author is right, but if one finds the message of christ a humanitarian one, making a film about him that hurts people intimately– doesn’t seem right.
i’ve been thinking so much lately about quakerism vs. uu. uu’s keep feeling like such wishy-washy quakers. the humanitarian ideals are there– but they so much lack the sense of personal responsibility– the quaker understanding of this seems to come so much from the belief in a christ/god within that must answer to the same within others– that one cannot/should not rest until that has been answered– while uu’s seem to come from such a place of ‘we have been wounded & are tender & exploring’ which is fine a lot– but a poor endpoint.
my us vs. them thing makes me nervous. just last night i talked about the danger of being disdainful to who we’ve been…
[last night, i was] thinking about how the problem is not with choice but with lazy choices. i think its fine to bring together things from multiple traditions– if they resonate, if they are real, if they feel true, if they challenge as well as comfort. we live in such a multicultural society, to ignore others’ paths to the truth is xenophobic in some ways.
…**** i had it so well in my head last night. it was tight & beautiful– without the flowers that seem to be getting in my way now.
we all come to the truth from different directions. it doesn’t matter if your path is eclectic, as long as you walk it authentically.
i really want to be a quaker, and i really, weirdly, want t proselytize.
‘here is beauty & community & supporting love. here is a challenge to be your best self. come.’
i’m nervous about how self-y i get in my spiritual searches. i get squinty-eyed & hunkered down– to work. distractions make me stressed & harsh. in such an intimate relationship as that which i have, that can be bad. i’d like to greet distraction kindly. it could give me as much gifts as solitude.
i just read an essay from the quaker seekers packet about ‘friends & womankind.’
i’m so used to viewing gender as passe & hurtful. it divides, it imposes rules, it devalues who we really are.
but! gender can be who we really are. i know that.
i only ever have patience for people who strive for authenticity– by my own perceptions & judgments of such.”
* i am actually completely incapable of drawing an ampersand. but i do a shorthand “and” that is like a swoopy t or plus sign. ironically, i started doing this after my fifth grade teacher told us we were not allowed to use it in our work. i’d never seen such a thing before. i don’t think i ever used it in my work, or at least i tried hard not to. i’m explaining this so that you know that my journal is not actually full of ampersands. sadly.
** in my writing, i underline rather than italicize. can one actually italicize while writing. i have not figured it out.
*** the — is when i have a line drawn between sections of an entry. sometimes i will indicate this with asterisks here.
**** usually …’s mean that i’m leaving something out, but not in this case. the ellipsis is in journal.